[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUILE 2/3 and string encoding cost
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: GUILE 2/3 and string encoding cost |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jan 2020 22:36:37 +0100 |
Am Mi., 22. Jan. 2020 um 21:52 Uhr schrieb Karlin High <address@hidden>:
>
> On 1/22/2020 2:07 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Do we have a standardized test file for benchmarking performance?
>
> I can't speak to "standardized," but I do remember some threads that had
> benchmarking going on by various users, using large LilyPond projects.
>
> The Robert Carver "Missa Dum Sacrum Mysterium" from Vaughan McAlley.
> (114 pages)
>
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-11/msg00700.html>
I took that file and compiled it with 2.19.83 and LilyPond-2.21.0/guile-3
Although, I didn't apply convert-ly, which may be a problem or not.
The results:
2.19.83
1. run
real 3m38,352s
user 3m24,493s
sys 0m4,659s
2. run
real 3m33,635s
user 3m23,291s
sys 0m4,563s
2.21.0 with guile-3
1.run
real 9m41,223s
user 11m36,337s
sys 0m3,600s
2. run
real 9m25,902s
user 11m20,798s
sys 0m3,743s
Cheers,
Harm
Re: GUILE 2/3 and string encoding cost, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/01/22
Re: GUILE 2/3 and string encoding cost, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/01/23
Re: GUILE 2/3 and string encoding cost, David Kastrup, 2020/01/23
Re: GUILE 2/3 and string encoding cost, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/01/24
Re: GUILE 2/3 and string encoding cost, Hans Ã…berg, 2020/01/24