Oh. My log made it to you. It bounced for someone. I’ll dig some more tomorrow. As far as I know, I have qt5 and no qt4 – I don’t really know them from a hole in the ground. Below are rpm checks. Can qt4 and qt5 coexist?
address@hidden build]$ rpm -qa | grep qscin
qscintilla-2.8-1.el7.x86_64
qscintilla-devel-2.8-1.el7.x86_64
address@hidden build]$ rpm -qa | grep qt
qtwebkit-2.3.4-6.el7.x86_64
qt-devel-4.8.5-13.el7.x86_64
qt5-rpm-macros-5.6.1-10.el7.noarch
qt-x11-4.8.5-13.el7.x86_64
qt5-qtbase-devel-5.6.1-10.el7.x86_64
qt5-qtbase-5.6.1-10.el7.x86_64
qt5-qtbase-gui-5.6.1-10.el7.x86_64
qt5-qtbase-common-5.6.1-10.el7.noarch
qt-4.8.5-13.el7.x86_64
qtwebkit-devel-2.3.4-6.el7.x86_64
qt-settings-19-23.5.el7.noarch
__________________________________________
There is no excellent beauty that hath not
some strangeness in the proportion. - F. Bacon -
From: Ozzy Lash [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:44 PM
To: address@hidden
Cc: Mike Miller <address@hidden>; Octave Help List <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Trying to compile Octave on RHEL 7.3
Compared to my config.log it looks like you are compiling against qt5, and it looks like I am using qt4. While I see that a lot of qt5 stuff is available, I don't see qscintilla packages for qt5
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Michael L. Metts <address@hidden> wrote:
Thanks, Mike. My log is attached. I'll switch to the release version you mentioned. I'll also try what Ozzy mentions if the ARPACK thing comes up with that as well. My log is attached.
__________________________________________
There is no excellent beauty that hath not
some strangeness in the proportion. - F. Bacon -
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Miller [mailto:address@hidden]
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 9:55 PM
To: Michael L. Metts <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Trying to compile Octave on RHEL 7.3
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 21:20:24 -0800, Michael L. Metts wrote:
> Thanks for getting back to me, Mike. I'm definitely hoping to build
> and run Octave 4 and not the stuff that's in EPEL. I understand that
> RHEL and Fedora have different bars (hurdles?) for what they will
> build and include ... although I can't understand why in this case
> since Octave 4 is more than a year old so it seems like it really
> should be in EPEL.
Yes but RHEL 7 is almost 3 years old. If you want a stable OS, that implies that you won't get the latest versions of things.
> Yes, I am using whatever's in the hg repo. Is that appropriate for
> what I'm doing? What I'm doing, btw, is trying to get a clean stable
> Octave 4 running on RHEL 7.3 that doesn't have any broken features.
I would recommend that you try to get the latest released version working, which is 4.2.1, from https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/octave/.
> The ARPACK issue seems pretty bad to me. Bad enough to not go
> forward. The ARPACK and QScintilla issues have been frustrating since
> they're there but it can't find them or doesn't like them.
>
> Thanks for mentioning the log. My software building skills are
> probably not that best. I am motivated, though, we (at my firm)
> aren't that keen on the cost of Matlab. I've used earlier versions of
> Octave on other platforms and really would like to get this going. I
> appreciate the help.
Yes, check config.log, forward a compressed copy of the log file if you need help finding the relevant details. There should be no problem with the versions of arpack and qscintilla that you have installed.
--
mike
_______________________________________________
Help-octave mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-octave