Re: is_complex_nd_array() ?

[jjg]

Max Brister wrote
> 
> Using grep in the development source it looks like is_real_nd_array is
> cruft that should be removed.
> 
> You should use is_real_type and is_complex_type instead.
> 

Thank you Max, finally I have a working check :

  if (! ( args(0).is_matrix_type() &&
          (args(0).is_real_type() || 
           args(0).is_complex_type())))
    {
      octave_stdout << "first argument must be a real or complex array\n";
      return octave_value_list();
    }

Bizzarely, is_matrix_type() is true for matrices and NDarrays.

I could see that is_nd_array_type() (which does not exist)
would be true for matrices, but an NDarray is a matrix type???

No matter, I have my check working.






--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/is-complex-nd-array-tp4642807p4642815.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.