[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks? |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:32:25 +0200 |
søn, 27 07 2008 kl. 08:57 -0500, skrev Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso:
> 2008/7/24 Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden>:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Kyusik Chung <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Plus, no one
> >> has contributed the time to put together any documentation, nor is
> >> that on any priority list.
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, not even you. It's not hard to guess why this is a low priority
> > thing for Octave developers - they study how the sources work, and
> > then they know, and they no longer need such docs.
>
> Hm, I'm thinking that this might not be so hard to do, only
> time-consuming. Would Doxygenising the sources be sufficient?
I think one problem with documenting the API's is that it might give the
impression that they are stable.
Søren
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, (continued)
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/07/22
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/07/27
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/25
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/07/27
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?,
Søren Hauberg <=