[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks? |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:46:23 -0400 |
On 22-Jul-2008, Kyusik Chung wrote:
| Sorry for not being more precise. Its not code we are going to
| distribute. Its back end code that will crunch some data we will put
| on our website, which will be free for consumers to use. I was using
| the term "application" in a very broad sense. Does that qualify?
Qualify in what sense? It does not make the software free for others
to use. We are sharing Octave with you but you are not sharing your
work with our community. Why should we go out of our way to help you?
jwe
- Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/21
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/22
- Message not available
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/07/27
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/25
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/07/27
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Søren Hauberg, 2008/07/27