[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The future of Octave
From: |
David Doolin |
Subject: |
Re: The future of Octave |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:13:46 -0500 (EST) |
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 8-Dec-2000, David Doolin <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> | 3. Operating systems are yesterdays technology. While I prefer command
> | line interfaces, I do not know anyone in my field (geotechnical
> | engineering) who are similarly inclined. So further developement should
> | enfold rational gui interfaces as well. Anyone who would insist on
> | sneering at gui's I would invite to write one. It's harder than you
> | think. Way harder. Very challenging in fact.
>
> Again, we have very limited resources. If your goal in writing free
> software is to satisfy `customers' rather than getting together with
> fellow developers to create something useful for the developers, then
> maybe you have the right idea here. But I believe it will suck a lot of
> resources away from the core numerical parts if you spend a lot of
> time putting a fancy gui on it.
The time I have spent putting a fancy gui on my discrete element code has
already paid off in for two other people getting a conference trip paid
by offering a short course in how to use the program, fancu gui included,
to solve problems in rock slope stability. Think rocks falling on
highways.
Obviously, I intend on developing my "customer" base as much as possible,
and using win32 gui makes an emininent amount of sense [1]. It is
resources in terms of development time that has been very well spent. Why
would having a "fancy gui" for octave be a bad thing? Would make the
barrier to entry too low?
Dave D
[1] FWIW, the numerical core can be downloaded from
http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/Programs/Geotech/DDA.
We plan on opening up the win32 base similar to how Peter Deutsch runs
ghostscript.
>
> jwe
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: The future of Octave, (continued)
- Re: The future of Octave, David DS Barnes, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave, John W. Eaton, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave, David DS Barnes, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave, Manuel A. Camacho Q., 2000/12/09
- Re: The future of Octave, John W. Eaton, 2000/12/09
- Re: The future of Octave, Jonathan C. Webster, 2000/12/10
- Wishlist (Was: Re: The future of Octave), Kevin Straight, 2000/12/13
- Re: Wishlist (Was: Re: The future of Octave), Johan Kullstam, 2000/12/20
Re: The future of Octave, David Doolin, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave, John W. Eaton, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave,
David Doolin <=
- Re: The future of Octave, Kevin Straight, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave, Paul Kienzle, 2000/12/09
- GUI (Was: The future of Octave), Kevin Straight, 2000/12/10
- Re: GUI (Was: The future of Octave), Rafael Laboissiere, 2000/12/10
Re: The future of Octave, Michele, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Trond Eivind GlomsrØd, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Michele, 2000/12/08
Alternative to Gnuplot [was: Re: The future of Octave], Rafael Laboissiere, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Trond Eivind GlomsrØd, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, robert . butora, 2000/12/09