[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The future of Octave
From: |
Herman Bruyninckx |
Subject: |
Re: The future of Octave |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:00:09 +0100 (CET) |
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Kevin Straight wrote:
First of all: Thanks John! (For all you did, and all you will be doing
in the future :-) )
> jwe's point is well taken. Octave is a very solid and useful application,
> but it is impossible to escape the fact that it is based on yesterday's
> technology, not today's. It does what it does very well, but it is
> inherently limited by design considerations. Working on my degree in
> applied math over the last three years I have become increasingly
> convinced that we are long overdue for the next evolution in
> mathematical software. I think we-the open source community-should be the
> ones to come up with it, and let the commercial teams scramble for
> bug-for-bug compatibility with US.
I agree with this!
> 1) Flexibility. If you're like me, you own at least one each of the
> following: numeric software (ie octave), statistical software (minitab or
> whatever), CAS/symbolic software (maple, derive, etc), technical document
> prep software (ie latex), and spreadsheet. If you're in engineering you
> also probably have CAD and flowcharting software. All of these duplicate
> features found in some or all of the others. NONE of them interoperate
> worth beans. They all use different interfaces and commands to accomplish
> the same thing.
Indeed. But I guess the way to go is to use some kind of CORBA-like
brokerage that can link a high-quality GPL plotting program (there are
some in the making, I think), a high-quality documentation tool (LaTeX
or MathML based), of course the high-level numerical tool which is
Octave, a high-level diagram interfacing tool (such as DIA, which
would allow to make a `simulink'-like graphical interface to Octave), etc.
A first practical step could be to (i) list which existing projects
would be useful for octave, and (ii) contact the maintainers of these
projects with concrete suggestions.
Personally, I am trying to set up an Open Source robot control project
(www.orocos.org, still in too preliminary state :-( ), and I had octave
in mind as the numerical core, and some other projects as other
`cores' (like dia etc). So, I would be willing to brainstorm about
these things the coming weeks.
--
address@hidden (Ph.D.) Fax: +32-(0)16-32 29 87
Dept. Mechanical Eng., Div. PMA, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Real Time and Embedded HOWTO:
<http://www.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/þbruyninc/rthowto>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: The future of Octave, (continued)
- Re: The future of Octave, Przemek Klosowski, 2000/12/11
- Re: The future of Octave, Trond Eivind GlomsrØd, 2000/12/11
- Re: The future of Octave, João Cardoso, 2000/12/11
- Re: The future of Octave, Trond Eivind GlomsrØd, 2000/12/11
- Re: The future of Octave, Kevin Straight, 2000/12/13
Re: The future of Octave, Paul Kienzle, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Andy Adler, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Kevin Straight, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave,
Herman Bruyninckx <=
- Re: The future of Octave, Kai Mueller, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave, David DS Barnes, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave, John W. Eaton, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave, David DS Barnes, 2000/12/08
- Re: The future of Octave, Manuel A. Camacho Q., 2000/12/09
- Re: The future of Octave, John W. Eaton, 2000/12/09
- Re: The future of Octave, Jonathan C. Webster, 2000/12/10
- Wishlist (Was: Re: The future of Octave), Kevin Straight, 2000/12/13
- Re: Wishlist (Was: Re: The future of Octave), Johan Kullstam, 2000/12/20