[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The future of Octave
From: |
David Doolin |
Subject: |
Re: The future of Octave |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:46:14 -0500 (EST) |
>
> > Should octave have additional "non-numeric" features to
> > support all sorts of generic scripting language features?
>
> Do scientific programmers need to do string processing? database access?
> GUI interfaces? process control? cgi scripts? How about a web interface
> to the data taken at your beamline which allows you to select a particular
> sample and applied field, perform a variety of fits and produce a graph
> of the results? The project I have in mind is being written in Java, but
> it would be nice if something like octave could handle it.
I don't if either octave needs this stuff or if I "need" it, but I want it
bad enough to move to win32 to get it. If I have to.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: The future of Octave, (continued)
- Re: The future of Octave, Paul Kienzle, 2000/12/09
- Re: The future of Octave, Rafael Laboissiere, 2000/12/09
- Re: The future of Octave, j . logsdon, 2000/12/09
- Re: The future of Octave, Kevin Straight, 2000/12/10
- Re: The future of Octave, Przemek Klosowski, 2000/12/11
- Re: The future of Octave, Trond Eivind GlomsrØd, 2000/12/11
- Re: The future of Octave, João Cardoso, 2000/12/11
- Re: The future of Octave, Trond Eivind GlomsrØd, 2000/12/11
- Re: The future of Octave, Kevin Straight, 2000/12/13
Re: The future of Octave, Paul Kienzle, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Andy Adler, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Kevin Straight, 2000/12/08