[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc license section
|
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
|
Subject: |
Re: doc license section |
|
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:07:26 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Witty <address@hidden> writes:
>> Yes, indeed. Maintain.texi says: "Manuals should use the GNU Free
>> Documentation License".
>
> Be aware that the feeling on the debian-legal mailing list is that the
> GFDL is not sufficiently free for materials in Debian [...]
Yes, but I'm going with the FSF here, simply because Guile is a GNU
package.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
- doc license section, Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/14
- Re: doc license section, Stephen Compall, 2004/01/14
- Re: doc license section, Neil Jerram, 2004/01/15
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Carl Witty, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Pierre Bernatchez, 2004/01/22
- Re: doc license section, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/22
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/22