[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc license section
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
Subject: |
Re: doc license section |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:58:41 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Witty <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Be aware that the feeling on the debian-legal mailing list is that the
> GFDL is not sufficiently free for materials in Debian (for a number of
> reasons which I personally find compelling).
You'll need to bring that up with the maintainer of maintain.texi
then, since surely gnu projects are going to follow the gnu
directions. (It'd be a full time job going around trying to convince
every project not to do so :-)
- doc license section, Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/14
- Re: doc license section, Stephen Compall, 2004/01/14
- Re: doc license section, Neil Jerram, 2004/01/15
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Carl Witty, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section,
Kevin Ryde <=
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Pierre Bernatchez, 2004/01/22
- Re: doc license section, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/22
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/22