[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JACAL, scm
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: JACAL, scm |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:03:27 -0700 (PDT) |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> Historically, () and #f were the same in Scheme, or optionally the
> same in Scheme, until R5RS. That makes reasonable sense, since the
> values are the same in most other dialects of lisp.
One point I was trying to make is that not everyone here is all that
aware of the history. Without that background, their reactions to
your assertions are likely to be different.
Now you are aware. Instead of dwelling on why the error was
committed, why not consider how best to fix it?
-t
- Re: JACAL, scm, (continued)
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/24
- Re: JACAL, scm, Maciej Stachowiak, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Bill Gribble, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Bill Gribble, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/09/26
- Re: JACAL, scm, Masao Uebayashi, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Michael Livshin, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/09/26
- #f and '() (was: Re: JACAL, scm), Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer, 2001/09/25
- Re: #f and '() (was: Re: JACAL, scm), Tom Lord, 2001/09/25