[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:32:28 +0000 |
Hi Werner,
> > > > > That should also be added to groff.texinfo -- I think there's
> > > > > a placeholder section for it, but it hasn't been written yet.
> > >
> > > Yes. groff_char(7) should be translated to texinfo.
> >
> > Has anyone asked GNU/rms if groff can be an exception to the rule?
> > rms seems happy that things like Ogg Vorbis aren't GPL or LGPL
> > because of their circumstances. So exceptions are possible.
>
> Sorry, but I don't know what you are talking about? What kind of
> exception do you have in mind?
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. I mean an exception to `documentation
shall be written in texinfo'.
Ralph.
- [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/17
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, P. Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2002/01/19
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Larry Kollar, 2002/01/19
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, P. Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2002/01/19
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/22
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, ralph, 2002/01/22
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/23
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Stewart C. Russell, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Stewart C. Russell, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man (info flamebait), Rick Richardson, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man (info flamebait), Ralph Corderoy, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Ted Harding, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Stewart C. Russell, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Larry Jones, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] (no longer anything to do with) groff_ms.man, Stewart C. Russell, 2002/01/24