[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping?
From: |
Reinhard Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping? |
Date: |
17 Jan 2003 21:16:54 +0100 |
Am Fre, 2003-01-17 um 19.41 schrieb Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti
Dutra:
> On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 18:39, Reinhard Mueller wrote:
> >
> > It might be that we mean different things when we talk about "die-hard
> > normalization at any cost".
>
> What do you mean?
There are situations when normalization is ineffective and doesn't bring
anything.
(disclaimer: i could have misunderstood something)
For example, a rule of normalization says that there are no repeating
fields in a table. So for an address to have an address-line-1, an
address-line-2, an address-line-3 and a city, you would have to make two
tables, one containing the address-lines (one line per record) and
another one for the city. That isn't practical. And that's where I guess
we won't do normalization.
Thanks,
--
Reinhard Mueller
GNU Enterprise project
http://www.gnue.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping, (continued)
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping, Jason Cater, 2003/01/16
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping, Daniel E Baumann, 2003/01/16
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping?, Reinhard Mueller, 2003/01/17
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping?, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra, 2003/01/17
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping?, Reinhard Mueller, 2003/01/17
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping?, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra, 2003/01/17
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping?,
Reinhard Mueller <=
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping?, neilt, 2003/01/18
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping?, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra, 2003/01/23
- Re: [Gnue-dev] Object-Relational Mapping, Daniel E Baumann, 2003/01/16