[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 06 Sep 2019 16:31:50 -0400 |
You might not recommend, but I use Trisquel. Depends on Debian. The
question is, does GNU want us to spent time on those projects, or
Is that precious time better spent elsewhere.
That is up to each maintainer to decide. If you think a GNU project
is useful, or you enjoy using then the effort to package it for the
GNU/Linux system, or other system you prefer seems like a useful task.
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, (continued)
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, bendikker, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, bendikker, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Nala Ginrut, 2019/09/06
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jason Self, 2019/09/06
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Nala Ginrut, 2019/09/08
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Richard Stallman, 2019/09/04
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Nala Ginrut, 2019/09/04
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/04
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, bendikker, 2019/09/05