[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther
From: |
Anton Ertl |
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:24:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:01:29PM -0500, Owen wrote:
> I was wondering why gforth was written
In the beginning, the idea was to have a free and portable
implementation of Forth-94 (ANS Forth) that should be the
Forth-94-compatible successor of fig-Forth and F83 (a popular system
that implemented the Forth-83 standard). The goals are outlined in
<http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/gforth/Docs-html/Goals.html>,
and you can read more about the ideas behind it and the original
implementation approach in
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/papers/ertl93.ps.gz
- anton
- Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther, (continued)
- Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther, David Kuehling, 2011/02/25
- Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther, Owen, 2011/02/25
- RE: [gforth] New member, new Forther, Dennis Ruffer, 2011/02/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther, Owen Brand, 2011/02/25
- RE: [gforth] New member, new Forther, Dennis Ruffer, 2011/02/26
- Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther, Owen Brand, 2011/02/26
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: [gforth] New member, new Forther, Dennis Ruffer, 2011/02/26
- Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther, Owen Brand, 2011/02/26
- Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther, Matt Wilbur, 2011/02/26
- Re: [gforth] New member, new Forther,
Anton Ertl <=