Re: getting FSF Europe, Chatper UK going (was Re: Thanks)

[Unknown]

address@hidden>
From: MJ Ray <address@hidden>
X-Face: @[T,(mp+X0,uT5~Dq0'FE7HPw+oDl6q_DSL%)h6v`6W,t2]\nA{>g\n9rU6O!0{=h<AALMw 
address@hidden"E&[Bqb!91/5s).A<Llb#K*%IG:address@hidden ]rZikn3mV9}`OLH?
Organization: Cat-killingly bad
Date: 20 Jun 2001 09:25:20 +0100
In-Reply-To: Loic Dachary's message of "Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:10:07 +0200"
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines: 29
Sender: address@hidden
Precedence: bulk
X-IMAPbase: 993047963 274
X-UIDL: UQ,!!LpM!!B1f!!8Pj"!
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                      
X-UID: 1

Loic Dachary <address@hidden> writes:

>       As in SourceForge the management of the mailing list is
> separate from the management of the project.

I thought the benefit of SourceForge was that its admin structures
were integrated across the different facilities?  If the same user
records aren't used for mailing list admin as cvs admin...

You'll have to pardon my ignorance on the administrative workings of
SourceForge.  I'm not an admin on a project on a SF site.

>       Frederic, Raphael listed all the advantages of using the GNU
> project as a technical infrastructure, I can't really add anything to
> this list. 

I can understand using the GNU project, but what is this mania for
sourceforges?

>       :-) There are many threads on this subject currently. One effort
> toward better mobility of projects among hosting facilities is the new
> born http://coopx.eu.org/ group. All this is progressing slowly.

Mobility between behemoths is a different problem.  Distribution
between hosting facilities, so that you can have your mailing list in
place A and your CVS in place B and your webspace in places D, E and F
is a different, wider problem.  Oh well, another list to look into.
-- 
MJR
-
FSFE discussions U.K
address@hidden
http://www.x31.com/~ukfsfe/