[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introducing Org-transclusion
From: |
Noboru Ota |
Subject: |
Re: Introducing Org-transclusion |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Nov 2021 11:14:05 +0100 |
Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Tim,
>
>> I feel it is functionality which will be used by a subset of users
>> or by others only occasionally.
Tim, thank you for your feedback.
Timothy, thank you for forwarding Tim's feedback into the loop.
I think this assessment is fair and reflects the current usage from the
feedback I get.
>> WRT making this part of org-mode core, I’m not in favour. This is no
>> reflection on the package, which I think is a great addition to the org
>> ecosystem. My preference would be for this package to be an add-on
>> package in either ELPA or non-GNU ELPA.
I will take this as the guidance and pursue ELPA as my first option. I
have just signed and returned the FSF copyright assignment form.
Now I will need to go and learn how to add a package to ELPA.
Thank you.
Noboru
- Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, (continued)
Re: Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Thomas Paulsen, 2021/11/01
Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Timothy, 2021/11/02
Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Noboru Ota, 2021/11/01
Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Uwe Brauer, 2021/11/05
- Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Noboru Ota, 2021/11/05
- Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Uwe Brauer, 2021/11/05
- Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Noboru Ota, 2021/11/05
- Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Uwe Brauer, 2021/11/06
- Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Ihor Radchenko, 2021/11/06
- Re: Introducing Org-transclusion, Noboru Ota, 2021/11/06