Re: Gitlab Migration

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 28.08.2021 00:44, Theodor Thornhill wrote:

> > There's no such examples on the home page (and it does have a link to a
> > page supposed to resemble a code review). If you have a better link,
> > please share.
>
> https://lists.sr.ht/~technomancy/fennel/patches/24386
>
> This shows both a build that succeeded and an inline comment.  More
> complicated stuff is likely still missing, but this seems to address
> part of what you were referring to, doesn't it?

Finally found it. Yeah, that looks good. Hope others will have an easier 
time noticing it.

> There's also examples
> where faling builds sends out notifications etc.  I can try to find some
> of those, but that will be shooting in the dark until I find one...

I think I'll take you at your word here. And yeah, notifications are 
important.

> > The review UI would need to be tied to a particular branch, instead of
> > some file attachments. And happen not in a email client, but either in a
> > browser, or perhaps some re-implementation of the same UI inside Emacs.
>
> Yeah, I agree this is missing, at least if we're not willing to accept
> that this might not be the number one thing to need before migrating.

I think a more important blocker is the bug tracker integration 
(sourcehut has something called "todo", right?). I hear it's still 
work-in-progress, though maybe that info is outdated?

If after migration we're still using Debbugs, that's pretty much going 
to nullify any advantages, in my eyes.