Re: [Dfey-nw-discuss] CMS for website

[Tim Dobson]

Robert Leverington wrote:
> You make some interesting suggestions, that seem to me to be quite
> sensible.  If we go for a more static site there won't be the need to
> monitor who is updating it since all the content will be agreed upon in
> advanced (we could use pages on the wiki to organise this, but I haven't
> really thought that through).  Furthermore agreeing upon all the content
> before posting it live is likely to significantly reduce drama
> considerably.

Exactly. I think that sums up pretty much exactly what I thought.

> The general idea we discussed on IRC was that we would use the CMS for a
> news feed and having a few static pages, but thinking about it further it
> seems unlikely that there will be so much news and a firm system for
> managing static content seems the way forward.

Yep.

The contentious bit, however, is essentially, do we need a CMS for 
essentially static content.

I personally think the cms I suggested looks cool at this, but noone 
will have any experience in using it.

Tim