bug-gnu-electric
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issues with technology editing in version 7


From: Pierce Keating
Subject: Re: issues with technology editing in version 7
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:33:38 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Dima,
 
I just sent the signed copies of legalese to Steve, so I plan to start working in 8.05 as soon as I can.
 
With respect to the npn scaling, I wasn't planning to scale the npn transistors because I can't predict what the spice models would be (NPN's vary greatly with different layouts). I have information from AMI that provides SPICE models for a given npn transistor geometry, so I was just going to stick as close to that as possible.
 
Yes, I noticed that I'm stuck with the SUBM rules as well. I started changing them in the existing techology - not sure whether I would pull the plug and start over again. I assume that when I converted the mocmos technology for editiing, if had set the rules to be SCMOS, that the new library would be set to those rules? I guess I'll be starting over again in 8.05, so I'll be sure to check for it then.
 
Yes, I also noticed the "exact" wording in the SCMOS active cut rules as well. The AMI npn layout seens to have non-square cuts, so wasn't sure what I was going to do. Maybe it's safest to make them all square.
 
Thanks very much for your questions.
 
Pierce

address@hidden wrote:
Hi Pierce,

After a few attempts I see that it is too difficult to me to force tecEdit in Electric 8.05
to handle technology libraries generated by Electric 7.
Steve told me that you will be able to test pre-releases of 8.05 (especially technology definition).
I continue implementation of new style of technology definition in Electric-8.05.

Also I looked at
http://www.mosis.com/Technical/Designrules/scmos/scmos-pbase.html
and at your technology library for this process.
I have some questions:
1) I am not good in physica of bipolar transistor:
How will "npn" node be scaled with width and height variation ?
Will emitter region or base region grow ?
2) SCNA page says that AMI process is defined only for SCMOS 2 metal, 2 poly rules.
It seems that your tech library is for SUBM 2 metal, 1 poly rules.
3) It seems that MOSIS cut should be square with EXACT minimal size isn't it ?

-Dima




_______________________________________________
Bug-gnu-electric mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-electric


Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]