[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Separate website?
From: |
Matthew Flaschen |
Subject: |
Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Separate website? |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2007 18:39:51 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) |
address@hidden wrote:
> Be careful not to spark a fire. To demand that a creator of a software
> must be acknowledge is quite touchy here.
That's not true. Noting the author and source is a matter of respect,
and doesn't compromise freedom in any way.
> Because in fsf, and in free software ideology, no one owns the software,
> including its author.
The author owns the copyright, but passes on the essential freedoms.
However, that's beside the point, which is just proper credit.
> Credits were normally given out of respect, but freedom says you dun
> have to.
Exactly which of the 4 freedoms
(http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) is this?
Matt Flaschen
- Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Separate website?, (continued)
Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Separate website?, advocate, 2007/05/23
Re: [Advocate Play Ogg] Separate website?,
Matthew Flaschen <=