[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?
From: |
Robert J. Hansen |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 May 2012 12:01:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 5/31/12 11:58 AM, John Clizbe wrote:
> Other than the name being somewhat offensive in some English speaking
> countries?
I'm going to chime in here on the side of the "git isn't necessary" crowd.
Git is a fine RCS for large distributed projects. For the Linux kernel
it's almost ideal. But SKS is not a large distributed project: it's a
fairly small one, is unlikely to grow into a huge one, and I'm not sure
it's worth the additional complexity over other simpler RCSes.
Feel free to emphatically disagree, of course. :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, (continued)
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, C.J. Adams-Collier, 2012/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, Jan Kesten, 2012/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, Matthew Palmer, 2012/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, David Benfell, 2012/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, Jeffrey Johnson, 2012/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, Matthew Palmer, 2012/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, David Benfell, 2012/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, Phil Pennock, 2012/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, Yaron Minsky, 2012/05/30
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, John Clizbe, 2012/05/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?,
Robert J. Hansen <=
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/05/27