Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?

[Matthew Palmer]

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 09:37:49PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> On May 26, 2012, at 8:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> > On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >> Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
> >> a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a mercurial 
> >> hosting service.
> > 
> > Just for my own idle curiousity, if the complaint about google code's
> > hosting is that its pull request architecture is inferior, wouldn't
> > that be a criticism of mercurial itself?
> 
> One could reason that ptomaine poisoning from rotten meat in a
> restaurant was the fault of the cow ...

Well, sure it is.  If the cow had only thought to store itself better,
everything would have been just fine.

- Matt