Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?

[Jeffrey Johnson]

On May 26, 2012, at 8:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>> 
>> Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
>> a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a mercurial 
>> hosting service.
>> 
> 
> Just for my own idle curiousity, if the complaint about google code's
> hosting is that its pull request architecture is inferior, wouldn't
> that be a criticism of mercurial itself?
> 

One could reason that ptomaine poisoning from rotten meat in a
restaurant was the fault of the cow ...

73 de Jeff