[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?
From: |
John Clizbe |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2012 22:08:10 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.20pre) Gecko/20110606 Mnenhy/0.8.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.15pre |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1,SHA256
Yaron Minsky wrote:
> John? Seems like you're the main person who I haven't heard a response
> from. How do you feel about switching to bitbucket?
>
Sorry for the late reply, Long weekend at BF's place. And a slew of catch up
once I got home.
Haven't had a lot of time to look at it. There is a nice centrality to
Google, but I'm really tired of Google's SSL cert of the week when I push.
How difficult will it be to migrate existing repos: trunk, me, Kristian, etc?
That's my only question. Other than that, for now I'm site-agnostic.
- -John
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12-git-509fe4ce-2012-01-31 (Windows XP)
Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
Comment: Be part of the £7 ECHELON -- Use Strong Encryption.
Comment: It's YOUR right - for the time being.
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=
=mqnR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, John Clizbe, 2012/05/31
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/05/27