[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?
From: |
David Benfell |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket? |
Date: |
Sat, 26 May 2012 17:35:11 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
> a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a mercurial
> hosting service.
>
Just for my own idle curiousity, if the complaint about google code's
hosting is that its pull request architecture is inferior, wouldn't
that be a criticism of mercurial itself?
- --
David Benfell
address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=DfD3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, John Clizbe, 2012/05/31
Re: [Sks-devel] Bitbucket?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2012/05/27