Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Navigation routines as modules and cleanup

[Felix Ruess]

"load" is already used to load/add a module in the airframe file, so maybe not the best choice.

Prepare or prep sounds good to me, I guess setup would also be fine.

And I agree with Loic: the most important thing is to just have it properly documented in the end...

Is there anyone with experience in using the old OSAM poly_survey and poly_survey_adv (renamed to nav_survey_poly_osam and nav_survey_poly_adv for now)?

It would probably make sense to clean them up and only have one nav_survey_polygon in the end...

On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Loic Drumettaz <address@hidden> wrote:

"init" sounds good but isn't consistent with other init functions in the code.
"start" and "run" are fine,
other names are possible, we could add "compute" and "execute" to the list?
The most important is to have some examples.
Loic

Le 9 nov. 2013 04:38, "alonso acuña" <address@hidden> a écrit :

I think "setup" , "config" or "prepare" could work.

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Chris Gough <address@hidden> wrote:

> We are still not sure what the best name for the start function is, feedback would be appreciated.

What about "load"?

Chris Gough
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel