|
From: | Hector Garcia de Marina |
Subject: | Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket |
Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:51 +0100 |
It's not physics, it's firmware. Limits are result of treaties.About GPS measuring Ground Speed and ECEF Position at high velocity, I really do not know about how the accuracy is affected, Doppler effect, etc.Http://armscontrol.org/documents/mtcrSee section 11.The firmware/hardware isn't more expensive, only the paperwork. You have to prove you won't pass it on, among other things.But it seems that you need an expensive GPS module.
Chris GoughHéctor.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Chris Gough <address@hidden> wrote:
> Does the paparazzi code accomodate velocities as large as Mach 2- Mach 3?I don't know, sorry (don't see why not though, try it in
simulation...). Maybe someone else can comment on that.
Do I understand you correctly:
* the rocket will go directly where you aimed it, it's not actively "navigated'
* the autopilot is not responsible for maintaining vertical attitude
* your instruments require a constant orientation (roll in the
rocket's frame of reference) during the preiod between boost and apex.
* your experiments require position and attitude logging during the
same flight phase.
Chris Gough
> Best regards,
> Florin Mingireanu
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
--
.
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
--
Héctor
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |