[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket
From: |
Chris Gough |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:34:05 +1100 |
> Does the paparazzi code accomodate velocities as large as Mach 2- Mach 3?
I don't know, sorry (don't see why not though, try it in
simulation...). Maybe someone else can comment on that.
Do I understand you correctly:
* the rocket will go directly where you aimed it, it's not actively "navigated'
* the autopilot is not responsible for maintaining vertical attitude
* your instruments require a constant orientation (roll in the
rocket's frame of reference) during the preiod between boost and apex.
* your experiments require position and attitude logging during the
same flight phase.
Chris Gough
> Best regards,
> Florin Mingireanu
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
--
.
- [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Florin Mingireanu, 2012/02/13
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Aka, 2012/02/13
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Chris Gough, 2012/02/13
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Florin Mingireanu, 2012/02/13
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Chris Gough, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Hector Garcia de Marina, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Chris Gough, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Florin Mingireanu, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Bernard Davison, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] question about paparazzi on sounding rocket, Chris Gough, 2012/02/14