Re: [Om-synth] Re: The name. Again.

[Dave Robillard]

On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 12:44 +1000, Loki Davison wrote:
> On 6/3/06, Dave Robillard <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:33 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 15:31 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Alright, I have a new site where everything Om is moving, so the name
> > > > change is actually going to happen now.
> > > >
> > > > Out of all the names on the Wiki, I like "Maud", so that's what it's
> > > > going to be unless someone has any other suggestions (that I prefer).
> > >
> > > How about "Maudel"?  Seems those of you who hate "Maud" don't like the
> > > old-lady's-name aspect of it.
> > >
> > > Maudel = modular + audio
> > >        = model (eg to build or design something, eg UML)
> >
> > or "Grauph", eg audio graph.
> >
> > With this one om_gtk can be called Grauphical, which is beyond
> > clever. :)  (edrz gets all the credit for that one).
> >
> > I think I like this one...
> >
> > -DR-
> Maudel and Grauph are quite nice. Maud is horrible. ;) Maudel does
> make me think of middle earth which may or may not be a good thing.

I prefer both to Maud as well.

Which though, I dunno.

-DR-