Re: [Om-synth] Re: The name. Again.

[Dave Robillard]

On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 09:03 +1000, Loki Davison wrote:
> On 6/6/06, Dave Robillard <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 12:44 +1000, Loki Davison wrote:
> > > > Maudel and Grauph are quite nice. Maud is horrible. ;) Maudel does
> > > > make me think of middle earth which may or may not be a good thing.
> > >
> > > I prefer both to Maud as well.
> > >
> > > Which though, I dunno.
> >
> > Okay.
> >
> > I think what I'm going to go with is "Grauph", for the name of
> > the /suite/ of applications that compose Om.  That way everything gets a
> > proper name, but the lot has a nice name to refer to the project by.
> >
> > Basically:
> >
> > om-synth      -> Grauph
> > om            -> Graupher   (server)
> > om_gtk        -> Grauphical (graphical)
> > omsynth.py    -> Graupy     (graupee?)
> > om_demolition -> Graupholition
> >
> > etc.  Something coherent instead of the current random mess.  Is this a
> > bit much though?
> >
> > It's nice to have a root to base new app names on, since there's only
> > going to be more over time.  eg a "om_gtk and om engine in the same
> > process" app?  Graupholithic.  AJAX UI?  Grauphax.  etc. etc.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Unless someone has a better idea, this is it.
> >
> > -DR-
> 
> 
> i like it. How is one supposed to say 'au' though? As in oww, that
> hurt or something else?

As in "audio" (since that's where it comes from)

-DR-