[Om-synth] Re: The name. Again.

[Paul Grodt]

> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 12:44 +1000, Loki Davison wrote:
> > > Maudel and Grauph are quite nice. Maud is horrible. ;) Maudel does
> > > make me think of middle earth which may or may not be a good thing.
> >
> > I prefer both to Maud as well.
> >
> > Which though, I dunno.
>
> Okay.
>
> I think what I'm going to go with is "Grauph", for the name of
> the /suite/ of applications that compose Om.  That way everything gets a
> proper name, but the lot has a nice name to refer to the project by.
>
> Basically:
>
> om-synth      -> Grauph
> om            -> Graupher   (server)
> om_gtk        -> Grauphical (graphical)
> omsynth.py    -> Graupy     (graupee?)
> om_demolition -> Graupholition
>
> etc.  Something coherent instead of the current random mess.  Is this a
> bit much though?
>
> It's nice to have a root to base new app names on, since there's only
> going to be more over time.  eg a "om_gtk and om engine in the same
> process" app?  Graupholithic.  AJAX UI?  Grauphax.  etc. etc.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Unless someone has a better idea, this is it.
>
> -DR-

As long as Grauph doesn't get confused with GNU's groff(1) and groffer(1).

Oh and hi all, I'm a software engineer/musician new to the list and very
excited about this project.

-Paul G.