lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Repeated durations: pitches vs rests


From: Timothy Lanfear
Subject: Re: Repeated durations: pitches vs rests
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 20:00:01 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0

On 22/02/2021 19:30, David Bellows wrote
And that's mainly what I was trying to find out. For me, the expected
behavior is that with a lone duration, the rest would be repeated if
it is the object immediately preceding the lone duration. If it turns
out that most people would expect that rest to be ignored and for
LilyPond to keep searching backward till it finds a pitch, then that's
fine. Not what I expected but if I'm in the minority then code
operates as it should. If I were in the majority then it would seem to
be in everyone's best interest if the behavior were changed.

Dave

David Kastrup (who probably implemented the feature) comments on the design decisions here https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-03/msg00355.html.


--

Timothy Lanfear, Bristol, UK.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]