[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19 |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:16:00 -0400 |
Hi David,
> I'm not sure that it does.
Did you compile my example?
The melisma shows correctly in both staves, where it doesn’t in the original
MWE.
Isn’t that what needed fixing?
Confused,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer (he/him)
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
- Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, Vaughan McAlley, 2019/08/26
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, Simon Albrecht, 2019/08/27
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, Malte Meyn, 2019/08/27
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, Malte Meyn, 2019/08/27
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/08/27
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, David Wright, 2019/08/27
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, David Wright, 2019/08/27
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/08/27
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, Vaughan McAlley, 2019/08/27
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, David Wright, 2019/08/28
- Re: Melisma breaking converting from 2.18 to 2.19, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/08/28