[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond lobbying?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond lobbying? |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:04:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> 2011/8/26 Dmytro O. Redchuk <address@hidden>:
>> On Fri 26 Aug 2011, 13:54 David Kastrup wrote:
>>> So maybe the "spacer rest" terminology is not doing anybody a favor.
>>>
>>> Would you have felt more comfortable if my example had used "\skip"
>>> instead of "spacer rests"?
>> No, not sure. Why "music" should contain any "skips" to be "typeset" nicely?
>>
>> Well, really, excuse me :-)
>>
>> I wanted to say, that, very probably, "\<{...}" would be really great
>> (to shift starting point right). And that spacers are, as for me, a bit
>> "innatural".
>
> How do you like syntax like this:
> e1 \< #0.25 \f #0.5 \> f2 \! #0.5
> which would mean this
> \new Voice << { e1 f2 } {s4 s4 \< s2 \f \> s4 s4 \! } >>
> ?
Why would it create a new voice? Actually, I can't make head nor tail
of the above syntax. If I split the lower into
<< e1 {s4 s4\< s2\f\>} >> << f2 {s4 s4\!} >>
it becomes more comprehensible: start cresc after 1/4, reach \f and
start descresc after another 1/4, end 1/4 into the following note.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/28
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/28
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Martin Tarenskeen, 2011/08/28
- Shifting hairpins' starting/ending points etc [was: Re: Lilypond lobbying?], Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/29
- Re: Shifting hairpins' starting/ending points etc [was: Re: Lilypond lobbying?], David Kastrup, 2011/08/30
- Re: Shifting hairpins' starting/ending points etc [was: Re: Lilypond lobbying?], Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/30
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Trevor Daniels, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/08/26