[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond lobbying?
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond lobbying? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:47:12 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri 26 Aug 2011, 10:28 David Kastrup wrote:
> "Dmytro O. Redchuk" <address@hidden> writes:
> > I am not a composer at all, but... is this a "musical" approach?
>
> It's pretty much along the lines of the given verbal description. You
> could also do something like
>
> << c1 { s4\< s2\! s4 } >>
Yes, I know ,)
You can do this in a separate voice and then "filter parts" (to clean midi
output of those extra voices) from command line with some switches, or do it
whith tags etc-etc-etc.
That's very nice =:О]
And "easy to use".
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk "Easy to use" is easy to say.
Bug Squad -- Jeff Garbers
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Kieren MacMillan, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Urs Liska, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?,
Dmytro O. Redchuk <=
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/28
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/28
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/28