[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond lobbying?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond lobbying? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:28:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Dmytro O. Redchuk" <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu 25 Aug 2011, 23:51 David Kastrup wrote:
>> c1*1/4 s1*3/4\p
>>
>> c1*1/4 s1*3/4\<
>>
>> c1*1/4 s1*5/8\< s1*1/8\!
> I am not a composer at all, but... is this a "musical" approach?
It's pretty much along the lines of the given verbal description. You
could also do something like
<< c1 { s4\< s2\! s4 } >>
and that would be even closer since it would not use fractions, but
musical durations.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Kieren MacMillan, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Urs Liska, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek WarchoĊ, 2011/08/28
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/28