[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond lobbying?
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond lobbying? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:18:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic; KDE/4.7.0; i686; ; ) |
Am Friday, 26. August 2011, 12:48:28 schrieb Joseph Wakeling:
> On 08/26/2011 10:28 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > It's pretty much along the lines of the given verbal description. You
> > could also do something like
> >
> > << c1 { s4\< s2\! s4 } >>
>
> Is this a new notation for 2.14, or is it missing the \\ ?
Neither. It simply means that the two music expressions ("c1" and the "<< ...
>>") are to be interpreted in parallel in the current context.
> I ask because when compiling this under 2.12 I get two staves (see
> attached).
The cause here is once again our beloved implicit context creation... In the
above case, no voice or staff has yet been created, the << does also not
create one, so when lilypond sees the c1, it creates a voice+staff. When it
then processes the s4\<, it does the same, because it is apparently not in the
same voice (which was only created for the c1.
Wrap \new Voice aroud the <<....>> to explicitly create the voice or staff and
it will work:
\new Voice { << c1 { s4\< s2\! s4 } >> }
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/28
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/28
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/28
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Martin Tarenskeen, 2011/08/28
- Shifting hairpins' starting/ending points etc [was: Re: Lilypond lobbying?], Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/29
- Re: Shifting hairpins' starting/ending points etc [was: Re: Lilypond lobbying?], David Kastrup, 2011/08/30
- Re: Shifting hairpins' starting/ending points etc [was: Re: Lilypond lobbying?], Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/08/30
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Trevor Daniels, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?,
Reinhold Kainhofer <=
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/08/26
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Kieren MacMillan, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Urs Liska, 2011/08/25
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/18