Re: Lilypond lobbying?

[Trevor Daniels]

Joseph Wakeling wrote Friday, August 26, 2011 11:48 AM


> On 08/26/2011 10:28 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > It's pretty much along the lines of the given verbal description. 
> > You
> > could also do something like
> >
> > << c1 { s4\< s2\! s4 } >>
>
> Is this a new notation for 2.14, or is it missing the \\ ?
>
> I ask because when compiling this under 2.12 I get two staves (see
> attached).

No, nothing new, but you must embed it in an explicit Staff
or Voice.

Trevor



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3858 - Release Date: 08/25/11