[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind
From: |
prasun3 |
Subject: |
Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:56:57 -0700 |
I'm facing problems with my build because the configure detects the
platform as powerpc64 instead of ppc64 and looks for files named
*powerpc64* instead of *ppc64*
Is there a way to configure this?
Also, does this patch apply to 32-bit Power3 AIX too?
On 8/2/07, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi David!
>
> Its very good to have power main stream!
> Now I will do more complex tests and maybe incremental fixes!
>
> The only last problem is that you didnt run autoconf and automake, or
> didnt have removed Makefile.in, /src/Makefile.in and /tests/Makefile.in
>
> If you could do that and commit this files, I would be glad!
>
> Thanks,
> Flavio
>
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 10:01 -0600, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> > Jose,
> >
> > This patch looks good to me. I merged it and pushed it into the git
> > tree. I only did a build on x86 so no real testing on my end, but I
> > figured you were eager to see it in GIT so we can start doing
> > incremental fixes. ;-)
> >
> > Documentation updates are definitely welcome, too!
> >
> > Please let me know if you see any issues.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --david
> >
> > On 8/2/07, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Well, if the symbol has the the address of the function
> > pointer, it is
> > not a problem, I removed all get_function_address!
> >
> > Well, remember to do autoconf and automake.
> > And if possible, in libunwind page write this build
> > instructions:
> > CC='gcc -m64 -maltivec' ../libunwind/configure && make -j2
> >
> > regards,
> > Flávio
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 07:27 -0600, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> > > On 8/2/07, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> > > because when the symbol is a function, and you are
> > looking for
> > > it, we
> > > have the following:
> > > val = sym->st_value;
> > >
> > > but, in Power (I don't know how it works in IA64),
> > this value
> > > would be
> > > the address of entry in the table, not the address
> > of the
> > > symbol, so the
> > > look up will fail.
> > >
> > > Why is that a problem? On ia64, we also return the address
> > of the
> > > function descriptor. That *is* the value of a function
> > pointer, after
> > > all. I guess I'm still not following.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --david
> > > --
> > > Mosberger Consulting LLC,
> > http://www.mosberger-consulting.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mosberger Consulting LLC, http://www.mosberger-consulting.com/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libunwind-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
>
--
Prasun <http://prasun.info/>
Don't Worry, Be Happy.
-- Meher Baba
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino, 2007/08/01
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind, David Mosberger-Tang, 2007/08/01
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino, 2007/08/02
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind, David Mosberger-Tang, 2007/08/02
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind, Andreas Schwab, 2007/08/02
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino, 2007/08/02
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind,
prasun3 <=
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino, 2007/08/03
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind, prasun3, 2007/08/03
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] Power Libunwind, Jose Flavio Aguilar Paulino, 2007/08/03