________________________________
From: Dildar Sk <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: Implementing advanced scientific calculator.
Sergei,
I wanted to ask how much is it feasible in GSoC.
Will it be even a good proposal?
--
Sent from:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-General-f1599825.html
----------------------------
"how much is it feasible in GSoC" - I have no idea.
"Will it be even a good proposal?" - IMO it's a bad proposal because it's waste of resources (of efforts of developers).
...
Several years ago Octave package system was conceptually broken. It probably still is.
If so, a probably useful task would to define first and maybe implement a new package system.
Another useful feature would be to write Octave to Julia (
https://julialang.org/ ) translator.
Also, there is an interesting library to convert Octave code into C++ :
https://bitbucket.org/cyrille/cauchy . I haven't tried it yet. If it at least somehow works and demands improvement, improving it would be a great thing.
--Sergei.