[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Implementing advanced scientific calculator.

From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Subject: Re: Re: Implementing advanced scientific calculator.
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:22:31 +0900 (JST)

-- mtmillerOn Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:45:26 -0700, Sebastian Schöps wrote:
> > By the way, I do
> > not see why it should be of interest for the Octave community to write a
> > translator from Octave to Julia?
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 19:03:36 +0000, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> > 1) Julia is a much better language from the point of view of consistency
> > and human understanding, so ultimately one should better switch to Julia
> > and not lose the ability to use already developed Matlab/Octave code;
> I think the implication is that Sergei believes the Octave community
> should be spending its time and energy encouraging people to use tools
> other than Octave.
> -- 
> mike
I myself am translating my octave code to Python + SciPy.  There seems be 
Matlab to Python translate tools.
Activity for them are mainly in Python side. 
I think that, as Mike suggests, Octave community  need not pay on efforts to 
octave to Julia translator.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]