[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!
From: |
lynx . abraxas |
Subject: |
Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?! |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:04:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On 11/12/12 13:54:47, address@hidden wrote:
> On 11/12/12 13:46:42, address@hidden wrote:
> > Dear Ben,
> >
> > On 11/12/12 07:06:23, Ben Abbott wrote:
> > > Please run this script ...
> > >
> >
> > I tried to set plotboxaspectratio at various places but the output
file‐
> name
> > suggests that when printing plotboxaspectratio is reset. Any idea
why
> that
> > could be?
>
> I found the problem. If I comment out
> axis ([0,1,0,1,0,1], "equal");
> it works as expected. Is this behavior intended?
>
> Now that setting plotboxaspectratio works, I wonder is the value 1.25 for z
an
> estimate of Yours or is it connected to some internal setting of octave
that
> makes the axes ratios exactly 1:1:1?
Empirically I found that a value of 1.45 results in a nearly 1:1:1 figure. I
wonder though if it would be possible to calculate this value from some
internal variable of octave. I’d expect that somewhere in the code it is
either hardcoded or calculated. Does anybody know more about this?
Kind regards,
Lynx
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!, (continued)
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!, lynx . abraxas, 2012/12/10
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!, lynx . abraxas, 2012/12/11
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!, lynx . abraxas, 2012/12/11
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!, Ben Abbott, 2012/12/11
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!, lynx . abraxas, 2012/12/11
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!, lynx . abraxas, 2012/12/11
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!, Benjamin Abbott, 2012/12/11
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!, lynx . abraxas, 2012/12/11
- Re: No "square" plotting in 3d any more?!,
lynx . abraxas <=