[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: forking
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: forking |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:42:44 +0200 |
On 19 Sep 2012, at 10:45, Francesco Potortì wrote:
>> As far as "you can always fork it", let's get real: once a project of
>> such force (user-wise and community-wise) is in place, the marginal
>> utility for any would-be dissenter is much, much smaller than the
>> incentives for joining in. I will change my opinion when I see a major
>> open-source project with a large active community (like Linux) forked
>> successfully for the long term.
>
> Okay, this is off-topic, but it's interesting. I know of at least two
> major free software projects having forked and still being alive in both
> braches. The most ancient is Emacs vs. Xemacs, the second is Openoffice
> vs. Libreoffice. Anyone knowing more examples?
graphicsmagick vs. imagemagick?
c.
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, (continued)
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, marco atzeri, 2012/09/16
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Michael Goffioul, 2012/09/16
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Dan Muresan, 2012/09/18
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Michael Goffioul, 2012/09/18
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Dan Muresan, 2012/09/19
- forking, Francesco Potortì, 2012/09/19
- Re: forking, Doug Stewart, 2012/09/19
- Re: forking, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/09/19
- Re: forking,
c. <=
- Re: forking, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/09/19
- Re: forking, Dan Muresan, 2012/09/19
- Re: forking, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/09/19
- Re: forking, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/09/19
- Re: forking, Thomas Weber, 2012/09/19
- Re: forking, Ben Abbott, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Michael Goffioul, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Dan Muresan, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Michael Goffioul, 2012/09/19
- Re: Octave and cargo cult programmingHello, Judd Storrs, 2012/09/19