[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compiling SuiteSparse
|
From: |
Przemek Klosowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: compiling SuiteSparse |
|
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2012 10:59:47 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 05/27/2012 04:24 AM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
And I am especially glad and proud that successful compilation and
linking against 'metis' is yet another victory of me and hopefully
other people and pragmatism over the stupid GPL propaganda. And I've
been building with 'metis' for years.
Sergei, do not throw stones if you live in glass houses. IANAL, but my
personal understanding of METIS license is that you can only use it
freely if you are an educational institution or US government agency,
and even then only for limited, non-commercial purposes. Do you satisify
their restrictions?
Note that this doesn't even touch redistribution--these are just basic
usage conditions.
So, which license has un-pragmatic and stupid conditions, again?
Re: compiling SuiteSparse, John Young, 2012/05/29