[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave + mkl
|
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
|
Subject: |
Re: octave + mkl |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2012 16:37:22 -0400 |
On 16 May 2012 16:29, Joshua Dillon <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Joshua Dillon <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>>
>> My *VERY* informal timing of MKL+octave shows it to be exactly the
>> same speed as Matlab for "standard" operations like eig and eigs.
>> Indeed, matlab uses MKL for these operations.
eigs has little to do with MKL. It's done with ARPACK. Are you really
seeing a lot of difference with eigs?
> Also--I'm on a quad core i5 2405 so that probably explains the 4x
> speed-up.
So probably what we'd like to see is more parallelisation in OpenBLAS,
LAPACK, and fftw?
- Jordi G. H.
- octave + mkl, Joshua Dillon, 2012/05/16
- Re: octave + mkl, Francesco Potortì, 2012/05/16
- Re: octave + mkl, Joshua Dillon, 2012/05/16
- Re: octave + mkl, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/05/17
- Re: octave + mkl, Joshua Dillon, 2012/05/17