[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave + mkl
From: |
Joshua Dillon |
Subject: |
Re: octave + mkl |
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2012 14:55:37 -0700 |
Sorry I didn't intend to start a fight. ...Just thought "It was
useful to me and may be useful to others."
Cheers,
Josh
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Francesco Potortì <address@hidden> wrote:
>>MKL probably works faster.
>>
>>If so, end users care much more about performance than about ideology.
>
> If people cared much more about performance than about ideology Octave
> would simply not exist.
>
> Please be more careful with your wording. The Octave community does not
> like to promote non-free software.
>
>>End users, as long as they don't distribute Octave, have full right to
>>combine free and non-free SW inside their version of Octave (of course,
>>provided non-free SW license doesn't prohibit using it with free SW).
>
> No one said anything different from this.
>
>>It's very good there are people who promote ways to build faster Octave
>>- despite your ideological objections.
>
> Not here, please. This community is mainly interested in free ways to
> speed up Octave.
>
> --
> Francesco Potortì (ricercatore) Voice: +39.050.315.3058 (op.2111)
> ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Mobile: +39.348.8283.107
> via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Fax: +39.050.315.2040
> (entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it
--
Joshua V. Dillon, Ph.D.
Software Engineer, Google Inc.
650-404-7120 / address@hidden / http://www.almostsure.com
"If you work really hard and you're kind, amazing things will happen."
-- Conan O'Brien