[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs or xemacs?
From: |
Jochen Küpper |
Subject: |
Re: emacs or xemacs? |
Date: |
11 Sep 2002 18:25:32 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Emacs/Gnus |
On 11 Sep 2002 10:34:06 +0200 Klaus Berndl wrote:
Klaus> AFAIK this not correct: XEmacs has this nifty net-installer
Klaus> ported from Cygwin to the needs of XEmacs whereas GNU Emacs
Klaus> must still be installed by downloading one big archive
Klaus> (regardless of source-distrib or precompiled binaries),
Klaus> extracing it, reading the READMe and so on...
Actually Emacs is (3 packages) in the standard Cygwin install nowadays...
Greetings,
Jochen
--
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité GnuPG key: 44BCCD8E
Sex, drugs and rock-n-roll
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/09/10
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Adam, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Sacha Chua, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?,
Jochen Küpper <=
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Zhongtao Zhu, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, maierh, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, D . Goel, 2002/09/12
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Rodney Sparapani, 2002/09/11
Re: emacs or xemacs?, A. L. Meyers, 2002/09/14