[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs or xemacs?
From: |
Henrik Enberg |
Subject: |
Re: emacs or xemacs? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:04:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra@cwi.nl> writes:
> Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org> writes:
>
>> "Aurelio" <arele@wanadoo.es> writes:
>>
>> > I am going to use emcas. I usually use VIM but now it´s time to
>> > change... And here´s my first ask: emacs or xemacs??? What is the
>> > difference?? I think emacs21 have a good graphic display... But is
>> > xemacs more usefull???
>>
>> Nobody knows. They are both actively developped. You can try
>> news://alt.religion.emacs for the definite answer. :)
>
> Hey, no HTML! How did you manage to remove it in your reply?
The OP sent a multipart message with both html and plain text. In Gnus
you could set `mm-discouraged-alternatives' to get rid of crappy html.
--
Booting... /vmemacs.el
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Adam, 2002/09/11