[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs or xemacs?
From: |
Adam |
Subject: |
Re: emacs or xemacs? |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:51:02 GMT |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.6.1 |
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 17:18, Aurelio wrote:
> Hello!!! First of all, you must be patient with my english writing...
> Thanks!!!!
> I am going to use emcas. I usually use VIM but now it´s time to
> change... And here´s my first ask: emacs or xemacs??? What is the
> difference?? I think emacs21 have a good graphic display... But is
> xemacs more usefull???
> Thanks
If you have to use a Windoze system, XEmacs is easier to install. But if
you're using Cygwin it's not difficult to install GNU Emacs. On a proper
OS, they're both about the same to install. (Most Linux distros come with
both now.)
But GNU Emacs is the One True Emacs!
Re: emacs or xemacs?,
Adam <=
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Sacha Chua, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Zhongtao Zhu, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, maierh, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, D . Goel, 2002/09/12